In News: Defence Minister said that the Government is committed to make the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) more empowered and responsive and implement measures that were required in this direction.
Armed Forces Tribunal
It was established in August 2009 by the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007.
The Law Commission’s 169th report stated that disciplinary and service matters required quick resolutions and proposed a special tribunal for the military forces.
It is a military tribunal with the power of adjudication or trial of disputes and complaints related to commission, appointments, enrolments and conditions of service.
Besides the Principal Bench in New Delhi, AFT has 10 Regional Benches.
Composition
The Tribunal is composed of Judicial Members as well as Administrative Members.
The Judicial Members are retired High Court Judges.
Administrative Members are retired Members of
the Armed Forces who have held rank of Major General/ equivalent or above for a period of three years or more; or
the Judge Advocate General(JAG) who have experience in the post for at least one year.
Power/Jurisdiction
The Tribunal is empowered to adjudicate appeals against any order, decision, finding or sentence passed by a court-martial or any related matter.
It is also empowered to grant bail to an accused who is in military custody.
The Tribunal may have the powers to substitute for the findings of the court martial. It may:
remit the whole or any part of the sentence, with or without conditions;
mitigate the punishment awarded
commute such punishment to any lesser punishment or enhance the sentence awarded by a court martial.
Armed Forces Tribunal has both Original and Appellate Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction of other courts
In 2015, a Supreme Court bench had held that AFT verdicts could not be challenged before the high courts.
It had also said that an appeal against the AFT orders would lie before the apex court but only if a point of law of general public importance is involved.
In January 2020, the Supreme Court made it clear that the verdicts of the Armed Forces Tribunals (AFT) can be challenged before the high courts.
In March 2022, Delhi High Court held that the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 excludes the administrative supervision of the High Court under Article 227(4) of the Constitution.
However, it does not exclude the judicial superintendence and jurisdiction under Article 226.
Note:
Over 4.83 crore cases are pending in courts across the country,
While over four crore cases are pending in lower courts, the Supreme Court has over 72,000 pending cases.
