Introduction (Context)
India has refused to sign a joint statement at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in China as it did not reflect the country’s concerns on terrorism. Hence, discussing about SCO and its relevance.
What is SCO?
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) is a regional intergovernmental organisation founded to promote political, economic, and security cooperation across Eurasia. It is often described as a Eurasian political, economic, and security alliance, aiming to build mutual trust, combat terrorism, and enhance connectivity among member states.
Member Nations
The SCO is a grouping of 10 countries, including India, China, Russia, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Iran, and Belarus. The roots of the SCO lie in the “Shanghai Five” formed in 1996, consisting of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.
Observer States: Afghanistan, Belarus, and Mongolia.
Dialogue Partners: Includes countries like Turkey, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and others seeking closer cooperation with SCO.
Why was SCO formed?
- With the dissolution of the USSR in 1991 into 15 independent countries, there were concerns in the region about extremist religious groups and ethnic tensions coming to the fore. To manage these issues, a grouping was created for cooperation on security matters.
- Key Objectives
- Strengthen mutual trust and neighbourliness.
- Promote regional peace, security, and stability.
- Combat terrorism, extremism, and separatism.
- Enhance economic cooperation, connectivity, and cultural exchanges.
- The SCO is one of the few international organisations with primarily Asian members that deals with security issues. Its Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) regularly holds meetings and exchanges information.
Relevance of SCO
- Acts as a counterbalance to Western alliances like NATO in Eurasia.
- Provides a platform for India, China, and Pakistan to engage despite bilateral tensions.
- Enhances regional connectivity projects, e.g. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and India’s International North South Transport Corridor (INSTC)
- Conduct Successful “Peace Mission” joint military exercises to enhance anti-terror capabilities.
- Established the Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) in Tashkent to coordinate intelligence on extremism.
- Promoted trade facilitation and regional connectivity projects.
- Increased student exchanges, tourism promotion, and cultural festivals strengthening people-to-people ties.
- Launched the SCO Digital Integration Platform to promote fintech and e-commerce linkages.
- Initiated joint disaster management drills in Central Asia in response to increased climate-related disasters.
Recent Summit
- India has refused to sign a joint statement at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in China as it did not reflect the country’s concerns on terrorism.
- In the recent Pahalgam terror attack, victims were shot after they were profiled on religious identity. The Resistance Front, a proxy of UN-designated terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) claimed responsibility for the attack. India follow zero tolerance policy on terrorism.
- When the SCO draft statement did not mention Pahalgam but talked about the train hijacking in Balochistan, India has refuled to sign the statement.
Significance
Traditionally, Russia and China have dominated the SCO. With Russia’s focus diverted due to the Ukraine war since 2022, China’s influence has increased, especially as the 2025 SCO chair.
Further, Pakistan remains a key ally of China. Beijing has provided military aid to Pakistan, particularly after Operation Sindoor. China also uses its global clout to shield Pakistan from adverse international resolutions.
In this context, India’s refusal to sign the SCO draft document gains significance. No joint statement was issued at this year’s SCO meeting because India did not agree.
India reiterated its stance of ‘no compromise on terrorism’, highlighting that business as usual is not possible with nations supporting terrorism.
Challenges faced by SCO
- India-Pakistan and India-China tensions limit consensus building, as seen in the stalled SCO connectivity masterplan in 2025.
- Russia-China growing dominance raises concerns among smaller Central Asian states about sovereignty and equal say.
- Despite frameworks, intra-SCO trade remains low due to lack of infrastructure harmonisation and tariff barriers.
- Continued security threats, narcotics trafficking, and refugee influx remain unresolved despite SCO’s outreach efforts.
- Duplication of objectives with organisations like CSTO, EAEU, and BRICS dilutes focus and resources.
- Member states’ differing alignments with the US, EU, and other blocs hinder deeper strategic cohesion.
Conclusion
The SCO remains a crucial regional platform for fostering security and economic cooperation in Eurasia. However, its effectiveness is constrained by internal rivalries, unequal capacities, and geopolitical complexities. Going forward, its ability to address new age challenges such as digital governance, climate resilience, and inclusive connectivity will determine its relevance in shaping Eurasia’s strategic future.
Mains Practice Question
Q “Despite its growing membership and agenda, SCO’s effectiveness remains limited.” Do you agree? Substantiate with examples. (250 words, 15 marks)