Category: Environment and Ecology
Context:

About Irrawaddy Dolphin:
Source:
Category: History and Culture
Context:

About Samakka-Saralamma Jatara:
Source:
Category: Science and Technology
Context:

About Disobind Tool:
About Intrinsically Disordered Proteins:
Source:
Category: Government Schemes
Context:

About Womaniya Initiative:
Source:
Category: Geography
Context:

About Mt Elbrus:
Source:
GS II: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation; Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Health.
GS III: Science and Technology – developments and their applications and effects in everyday life; Intellectual Property Rights.
Context (Introduction)
India’s pharmaceutical sector sits at the intersection of TRIPS obligations, public health imperatives, and global geopolitics of medicines. Persistent concerns over evergreening by multinational pharmaceutical firms, high prices of life-saving drugs, and unequal access—especially in the Global South—have revived debates on how India should deploy its patent regime in the public interest.
Core Idea
India’s patent framework is TRIPS-compliant yet welfare-oriented, allowing the State to balance innovation incentives with access to medicines. Contrary to claims of “weak IPR enforcement”, TRIPS itself permit public-health-centric flexibilities, which India is legally entitled to invoke to prevent abuse of patent monopolies.
Key Governance & Policy Challenges
Why It Matters
India’s Legal & Strategic Options
International Dimension
Way Forward
Conclusion
India’s patent regime is not anti-innovation but anti-abuse. A calibrated and confident use of TRIPS-compliant flexibilities allows Bharat to protect public health, uphold constitutional values, and maintain credibility in the global intellectual property order—while still fostering genuine innovation.
Mains Question
GS II: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation.
GS III: Major crops – cropping patterns in various parts of the country, different types of irrigation and irrigation systems, storage, transport and marketing of agricultural produce and issues and related constraints; food security and related issues
Context (Introduction)
India’s reform momentum—spanning GST, IBC, DBT and FTAs—now confronts its most politically sensitive frontier: food and fertiliser subsidies. Despite falling inflation and improved macro stability, agriculture growth is slowing, and distorted price incentives continue to undermine crop diversification, soil health, and fiscal efficiency.
Core Idea
India’s subsidy regime, while rooted in food security and farmer welfare, has become economically inefficient and environmentally damaging. The current structure disproportionately favours rice–wheat systems and urea-intensive farming, crowding out pulses, oilseeds, fruits and vegetables—key to nutrition security and sustainable agriculture.
Key Issues and Distortions
Why It Matters
Way Forward
Conclusion
Completing India’s reform journey requires moving from input-heavy, distortionary subsidies to income support and nutrition-focused welfare. Political courage, phased implementation, and DBT-backed reforms can align fiscal prudence, farmer welfare, nutrition security, and environmental sustainability—true to the spirit of “Reform Express”.
Mains Question