Archives


(PRELIMS  Focus)


Rani Velu Nachiyar

Category: History and Culture

Context:

About Rani Velu Nachiyar:

Source:


This is box title

Category: Economy

Context:

About Live Events Development Cell (LEDC):

Source:


SOAR Programme

Category: Government Schemes

Context:

About SOAR Programme:

Source:


PathGennie

Category: Science and Technology

Context:

About PathGennie:

Source:


Mudumalai Tiger Reserve

Category: Environment and Ecology

Context:

About Mudumalai Tiger Reserve:

Source:


(MAINS Focus)


Security Camps as a Game Changer in India’s Fight Against Left-Wing Extremism

GS-III: Internal security challenges and their management, and linkages between development and the spread of extremism.

Context (Introduction)

India’s long-running Left-Wing Extremism (LWE) challenge has witnessed a decisive shift in recent years. Government data indicate nearly a 90% decline in Maoist violence since 2010.  A key factor behind this transformation, has been the establishment of security camps in remote and previously Maoist-dominated areas.

Core Idea

Security camps have altered the strategic landscape of counter-insurgency by ensuring permanent state presence in inaccessible regions. Unlike episodic operations, these camps integrate security, governance outreach, and development, thereby dismantling Maoist influence over territory, population, and narratives.

Challenges that Sustained Maoism Earlier

Why Security Camps Matter

Way Forward: From Security to Sustainable Peace

Conclusion

Security camps have proven to be more than tactical installations; they are instruments of state legitimacy in India’s counter-Maoist strategy. However, enduring peace depends on converting security gains into constitutional governance, inclusive development, and tribal empowerment—ensuring Maoism fades not just militarily, but socially and politically as well.

Mains Question: 

  1. “Counter-insurgency success depends as much on governance as on force.” Discuss in the context of India’s experience with Left-Wing Extremism. (250 words)

The Hindu


Raising Farmers’ Incomes: Lessons from Beed’s Krishikul Model

GS-III: (Major crops, cropping patterns, agricultural marketing, issues related to farm incomes, and inclusive growth.)

 

Context (Introduction)

Doubling farmers’ incomes has remained elusive despite policy emphasis, as conventional approaches focused on input subsidies and MSPs have delivered limited gains. The Beed experiment in Maharashtra, offers an evidence-based pathway to income enhancement through crop diversification, institutional support, and market integration.

Core Idea

The Krishikul initiative under the Global Vikas Trust demonstrates that shifting from low-value traditional crops to high-value fruit crops, combined with scientific farming and assured market linkages, can significantly raise farm incomes. Independent evaluation by TISS (2024) shows per-acre incomes rising nearly ten-fold within a short transition period.

Challenges in India’s Farm Income Strategy

Why the Beed Model Matters

Way Forward

Conclusion

The Beed experience shows that farmers’ income growth is not achieved by price support alone but by restructuring agriculture around value, markets, and institutions. Replicating such integrated models can transform Indian agriculture from subsistence-oriented production to income-driven growth.

Mains Question

  1. Why has income enhancement in agriculture remained elusive despite rising production? Discuss with reference to value-chain and institutional constraints. (250 words)

The Indian Express

 


 

Search now.....

Sign Up To Receive Regular Updates