IAS UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 4th February 2020

Archives


(PRELIMS + MAINS FOCUS)


Religious practices of various faiths

Part of: GS Prelims and GS Mains II – Secularism

In news:

In past: Women devotees of menstruating age were not permitted to worship here, out of respect to the celibate nature of the deity in this temple.

1991 : A Kerala high-court judgement had legalized this Ban , and forbade women from entering the temple 

In 2018 : The Constitution bench of the Supreme Court held that any exception placed on women because of biological differences violates the Constitution – that the ban violates the right to equality under Article 14, and freedom of religion under Article 25

From Prelims Point of View:

Article 14 :

Article 25 :

Daily Current Affairs IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 4th February 2020

Daily Current Affairs IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 4th February 2020

SRC: The Hindu


nCoV outbreak declared a State calamity in Kerala

Part of: GS Prelims and GS Mains II – Secularism

In news:

From Prelims Point of View:

Novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV :


NCRB study on Missing Women & Children 

Part of: GS Prelims and GS Mains II – Secularism

In news:

Daily Current Affairs IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 4th February 2020

Daily Current Affairs IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 4th February 2020

SRC: The Hindu

From Prelims Point of View:

National Crime Record Bureau


If tap water meets BIS norms, RO systems will be banned

Part of: GS Prelims and GS Mains II – Health

In news:

From Prelims Point of View:

Membrane-based water purification (Osmosis) :

Bureau of Indian Standards:

Providing safe reliable quality goods.

Minimizing health hazards to consumers.

Promoting exports and imports substitute.

Control over proliferation of varieties etc through standardization, certification and testing.


(MAINS FOCUS)


Indian Polity & Federalism

Topic: General Studies 2:

Bodo Issue

Context 

The signing of Historic Comprehensive Bodo Settlement Agreement (third Bodo Accord in three decades) in Jan 2020 between Government of India (Ministry of Home Affairs), Government of Assam and Bodo representatives.

Bodo representatives included: Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC), All Bodo Students Union (ABSU), United Boro People Organization (UBPO), National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) factions 

Daily Current Affairs IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 4th February 2020

Daily Current Affairs IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 4th February 2020

Pic Source: Yahoo news

Who are Bodos?

Bodos are the single largest tribal community in Assammaking up over 5-6 per cent of the state’s population. They have controlled large parts of Assam in the past

A timeline of Bodo Conflict 

Although the Bodo agitation has a long history that dates back to the pre-Independence era, the movement gained momentum in the late 1980s, when calls were made for the bifurcation the state of Assam.

1929 – Bodo leader Gurudev Kalicharan Brahma submits a memorandum to the Simon Commission asking for reservations in the Legislative assembly, and for a separate political entity for his people. His efforts go in vain

1960s and 1970s – There are calls from Bodos and other tribes for a separate state of ‘Udayachal’ as immigrants are accused of illegally encroaching on Bodo-inhabited lands

Late 1980s – Calls for a separate state for Bodos – Bodoland – and for Assam to be divided “50-50” are raised. The demand was primarily led through peaceful methods by All Bodo Students Union (ABSU) and its leader Upendranath Brahma

Also during this time armed separatist group – The National Democratic Front of Bodoland is founded (1986). 

Why the demand for separate Bodoland?

Progress made by government for resolution of Bodo issue

First Accord – Feb 1993 

The Bodoland Autonomous Council (BAC) is constituted after the Centre, the Assam government and the ABSU sign a tripartite agreement.

The BAC was given power over 38 subjects, with a 40-member General Council, including 5 members nominated by the state government, while rest of the seats were reserved for ST.

But, soon a section of Bodo people rejected the accord, and claimed it was “inadequate” to meet the long-cherished political aspirations of the people. 

The Bodo Liberation Tigers (BLT), an armed insurgent group, formed in June 1996, launched its armed movement for a separate Bodoland state.

Second Accord- Feb 2003

After six years of subversive activities, BLT signed a tripartite agreement with the Centre and Assam government.

The second Bodo accord led to the formation of the Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC) under the provisions of the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, which had more political power than the BAC A large number of the BLT cadres were absorbed in the CRPF.

The area under the BTC jurisdiction is officially called the Bodoland Territorial Area Districts (BTAD) comprising of 3,082 villages in four districts— Kokrajhar, Chirang, Udalguri and Baska.

However, ABSU continued with its movement of separate Statehood and different factions of NDFB continued to carry out hit-and-run operations, and disturbed peace.  

Third Accord – Jan 2020

The 2020 agreement has the following provisions:

Implication of the Third Accord

The agreement is hailed as a permanent solution to a conflict, which has taken over 4,000 human lives. 

Home Minister stated that Assam’s territorial integrity is assured with this agreement, as every single Bodo group has come on board.

Enhanced focus by Union government on tackling the issues of North-East so as to usher development in the region. 

This is reflected in Bru-Reang agreement signed on January 16, 2020 to end the humanitarian crisis in Meghalaya and Tripura, recent surrender of 644 armed cadres in Assam and surrender of 88 armed NLFT cadres in Tripura to bring them to mainstream.

Conclusion

The peace in Bodoland Territorial Region will depend on the evolving relationship between the Bodos, the dominant but not the majority in the BTR and other communities.

It also depends on the final implementation of the accord and the ability of the state to rehabilitate the militants so as to prevent them from taking up anti-social activities.


(TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE)


Model questions: (You can now post your answers in comment section)

Note: 

Q 1. One of the implications of equality in society is the absence of ?

  1. Privileges 
  2. Restraints
  3. Competition 
  4. Ideology

No Right is absolute, exclusive or inviolable. The Right of personal property, similarly, has to be perceived in the larger context of its assumed legitimacy. The Right of personal property should unite the principle of liberty with that of equality, and both with the principle of cooperation.


Q2. In the light of the argument in the above passage, which one of the following statements is the most convincing explanation?

  1. The Right of personal property is a Natural Right duly supported by statutes and scriptures.
  2. Personal property is a theft and an instrument of exploitation. The Right of personal property is therefore violative of economic justice.
  3. The Right of personal property is violative of distributive justice and negates the principle of cooperation.
  4. The comprehensive idea of economic justice demands that the Right of each person to acquisition of property has to be reconciled with that of others.

Q 3. In India, if a religious sect/community is given the status of a national minority, what special advantages it is entitled to? 

  1. It can establish and administer exclusive educational institutions.
  2. The President of India automatically nominates a representative of the community to Lok Sabha.
  3. It can derive benefits from the Prime Minister’s 15-Point Programme.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

  1. 1 only 
  2. 2 and 3
  3. 1 and 3
  4. 1, 2 and 3

ANSWERS FOR 03 FEB 2020 TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE (TYK)

1 D
2 B
3 C

MUST READ

Centre vs states

Indian Express 

Exile and return

Indian Express 

Search now.....

Sign Up To Receive Regular Updates