Baba’s Explainer – Equality Commission

• As per the Menon Committee Report, the EOC would have a grievance redressal function only in a limited and supportive capacity.
• The report emphasized the positive obligation of the State to control direct and indirect discrimination against minorities and marginalised communities.
• In a letter to the then Union Minority Affairs Minister, the then Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh and the then Union Minister for Law and Justice in June 2009, pointed out that while the Menon Committee report provided for equal opportunities and diversity, it failed to define and prevent direct and indirect discrimination.
• It was highlighted that the EOC, under the Menon Committee report, was restricted to explicitly prohibiting discrimination only in the employment and education sectors.
• The EOC, as proposed by the Menon Committee, relied on voluntary compliance and mediated settlements, thus lacking an enforcement mechanism.
• It was underlined the need for the proposed EOC to provide relief to individual victims of discrimination, in addition to its ‘group-driven’ model.

• The Anti-Discrimination and Equality Bill, 2016, a Private Member’s bill presented by Congress Parliamentarian Shashi Tharoor, aimed to protect every citizen against all forms of social discrimination.
• It was a step toward reintroducing anti-discrimination legislation.
• The Bill proposed the constitution of Central and State Equality Commissions toward
  • eliminating discrimination
  • promoting awareness
  • assisting aggrieved persons in seeking remedies
  • issuing guidelines for protection from discrimination from harassment
  • submitting annual reports.
• The Bill provides ‘symmetric protection’, that is, it protects minorities as well as majorities.
• It focuses on all forms of discrimination, and is not confined to caste, sex or religion.
• As a move away from the open-ended list covered under the Menon Committee report, Section 3A of the 2016 Bill protects against discrimination in relation to “caste, race, ethnicity, descent, sex, gender identity, pregnancy, sexual orientation, religion and belief, tribe, disability, linguistic identity, HIV status, nationality, marital status, food preference, skin tone, place of residence, place of birth or age”.
• Apart from prohibiting overt or direct discrimination in the form of prejudice or stereotyping, the 2016 Bill covers indirect discrimination, pervasive as “harassment, bullying, segregation, boycott, violence and victimisation”.
• The Bill prohibits discrimination in public as well as private spheres, including by employers, landlords, retailers and service providers.
• Thus, in addition to protecting the right to equality as an affirmative action, the Bill overtly prohibits discrimination in the areas of housing, education, work, and medical facilities, among other things
• The Centre for Law & Policy Research (‘CLPR’) introduced an Equality Bill, 2019 as an anti-discrimination bill based on multiple identities, not restrictive in protecting only specific grounds of discrimination.
• CLPR claimed to fix gaps in previous anti-discrimination Bills by addressing “intersectional, structural and systematic discrimination” against various forms of conduct such as “direct and indirect discrimination, discrimination by association, intersectional discrimination, systemic/structural discrimination, hate speech, harassment, segregation and boycott, victimization and lynching”.
  • Significantly, certain provisions of the 2019 Bill are dedicated to employment, education, public buildings and public places, healthcare, housing and land.
  • The Bill imposes a significant positive duty on the State and private actors in promoting equality.
  • By including household and domestic workers in the ambit of the Bill, it challenges the compartmentalisation of public and private sectors.

• In view of constituting an enforcement mechanism, Dr. Shashi Tharoor’s Private Member’s Bill of 2016, through its Central and State Equality Commissions, aims to create civil liability instead of criminalising acts of discrimination.
  • The Bill protects and compensates the victim, as opposed to punishing the perpetrator of discrimination. It views the Commission as an independent and efficient mechanism that tackles the problem of “under-enforcement of existing laws”.
• The CLPR Bill of 2019 seeks to prevent discrimination and promote equality by establishing Equality Courts.
  • Except in cases of lynching, the Bill aims to provide civil remedies through its Equality Courts.
  • It aims to provide reliefs in the form of declaratory relief, compensation, , directions to make available opportunities, audit of internal policies, affirmative action, settlement by consent, and interim relief.

• Part III of the Indian Constitution guarantees the fundamental right to equality under
  • Article 14 (equality before law)
  • Article 15 (prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth)
  • Article 16 (equality of opportunity in matters of public employment)
  • Article 17 (abolition of untouchability)
• Article 15 prohibits discrimination on the limited grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth. It, thus, excludes other pervasive forms of discrimination; for instance, sexual orientation, disability, marital status, pregnancy, occupation, and linguistic identity.
• Although Article 15(2) of the Constitution prohibits discrimination perpetrated by private individuals, few cases are litigated against private discrimination. Most litigation in courts is initiated against discrimination by the State.
• Furthermore, in the majority of cases, courts have restricted the interpretation of discrimination exclusively to its direct form, excluding other indirect discrimination including harassment, segregation, and victimization.
• Since only the High Courts and the Supreme Court have the power to address violations of constitutional rights, approaching these courts for every instance of discrimination is hardly a feasible choice. Moreover, the judiciary continues to be overburdened with a considerable backlog of cases.
• Thus, local enforcement mechanisms, in the form of equality commissions, fit the bill.

• Commissions like the National Commissions for Women, Minorities, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes, among others, exist to deal with and handle thousands of cases of discrimination each year.
• Notably, these individual commissions focus on protecting the rights of specific communities against specific discrimination.
• The National Commission for Women, for instance, deals with issues like cybercrime, dowry deaths, police apathy, gender discrimination in education and work, and other forms of discrimination against women
• While these Commissions handle complaints against inequalities, they do not provide an umbrella view of the discrimination witnessed in the country.
• Each of the Commissions operates with a different understanding of the term ‘discrimination’.
• While various committees existed to protect separate rights of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes and minorities, it is also felt that there is a need for an Equality Commission to enable the communities to unite.
• An entity like the Equality Commission, which is based on multiple identities and discrimination, can benefit from the complaints handled by the other Commissions.
• An Equality Commission can pose as a comprehensive mechanism that covers all forms of discrimination, as opposed to commissions that focus on caste, religion, or sex alone.
• However, it is imperative that the shortcomings of the proposed EOC under the Menon Commission be addressed, so that the functions of an Equality Commission do not overlap with the already existing Commissions dealing with varied forms of discrimination.

• The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is Great Britain’s national equality body . As a statutory non-departmental public body established by the Equality Act 2006, the Commission operates independently.
• The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) monitors human rights, protecting equality across 9 grounds – age, disability, sex, race, religion and belief, pregnancy and maternity, marriage and civil partnership, sexual orientation and gender reassignment.

Way Forward

• A coherent anti-discrimination or Equality Commission is, however, ineffective without the backing of a single, comprehensive anti-discrimination or equality law. While such legislation has been proposed time and again, it is now up to the government to adopt a singular equality law.
• The Private Member’s Bill of 2016 lapsed, with the government not showing any interest in adopting it. In view of the recent upsurge in violence against minority communities in India, such legislation acquires significance.