Day 41 – Q. 1. River interlinking projects in India promise water security but pose ecological and social risks. Examine the key challenges in implementing such projects and suggest a balanced approach. (150 words, 10 marks)

  • IASbaba
  • July 18, 2025
  • 0
Ethics Theory, TLP-UPSC Mains Answer Writing

Q. 1. River interlinking projects in India promise water security but pose ecological and social risks. Examine the key challenges in implementing such projects and suggest a balanced approach. (150 words, 10 marks)


Introduction 

India’s National River Linking Project (NRLP) aims to ensure equitable water distribution by  connecting 30 rivers through 16 Himalayan and 14 peninsular links. While promising water  security, it raises serious ecological and social concerns. 

Body

Ensuring Water Security 

  1. Addressing regional imbalances: NRLP proposes transferring water  from surplus to deficit basins, e.g.,  Ken-Betwa link aims to benefit  drought-prone Bundelkhand.
  1. Flood and drought mitigation: Himalayan links aim to reduce  annual flood damages (₹6,000  crore/year), while Peninsular links  tackle recurring droughts in Tamil  Nadu, Karnataka.
  1. Enhancing irrigation potential: The  project targets adding 35 million  hectares of irrigation capacity, vital  for doubling farmer incomes.
  1. Drinking water supply and  hydropower: Links are expected to  provide drinking water to 62 million  people and generate 34,000 MW of  hydropower. 

Key Challenges 

Major River Inter-Linking projects 

  1. Ecological disruption: Submergence of forests and alteration of river flows threaten  biodiversity and aquatic ecosystems. Example: Ken-Betwa link may impact Panna Tiger Reserve.
  2.  Displacement and rehabilitation: Large-scale relocation of communities with  inadequate resettlement remains a major humanitarian concern. Example: Polavaram project displacing over 44,000 families
  3. Inter-state disputes: Conflicts between states like Karnataka-Tamil Nadu (Cauvery) and  Uttar Pradesh-Madhya Pradesh (Ken-Betwa) hinder consensus. 
  4. Financial viability and delays: The NRLP demands over ₹5.6 lakh crore in funding, while  several links face delays due to bureaucratic and environmental clearance hurdles. 

Balanced Approach 

  1. Decentralised water management: Emphasise watershed development, rainwater  harvesting, and aquifer recharge at the micro level. 
  2. Environmental safeguards: Comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and inclusion of ecological flow provisions in all link plans. 
  3. Technological integration: Use of remote sensing, GIS, and AI to evaluate river basin  dynamics before implementing interlinking. 
  4. Stakeholder engagement: Transparent consultation with affected communities, experts,  and state governments to build consensus and address grievances. 
  5. International best practice – Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin Plan: It integrates basin level management with ecological sustainability, water trading, and stakeholder  participation—offering a model for India’s inter-basin projects. 

Conclusion

While river interlinking can enhance water security and agricultural productivity, it must be  pursued with environmental prudence, public participation, and integrated planning to  ensure long-term sustainability and equitable benefits for all regions.

Search now.....

Sign Up To Receive Regular Updates