Ethics Theory, TLP-UPSC Mains Answer Writing
Q. 3. “BIMSTEC holds the promise of linking South and Southeast Asia, yet remains underutilized.” Analyze India’s role in revitalizing the grouping in the current geopolitical context. (150 words, 10 marks)
Introduction
Formed in 1997, BIMSTEC was envisioned as a bridge between South and Southeast Asia. Amid shifting Indo-Pacific dynamics and SAARC’s stagnation, India has increasingly turned to BIMSTEC to promote regional connectivity and economic integration.
Body
India’s Strategic Interests in BIMSTEC
- Linking Act East and Neighbourhood First: BIMSTEC helps operationalise India’s twin regional strategies across the Bay of Bengal.
- SAARC stagnation: With Pakistan blocking SAARC progress, India sees BIMSTEC as a functional alternative.
- Maritime importance: Bay of Bengal is central to India’s Indo-Pacific vision, trade security, and energy routes.
- Countering China’s influence: Through BIMSTEC, India offers an inclusive, regional alternative to China’s BRI and expanding maritime footprint.
- Promoting sub-regionalism: BIMSTEC allows focused cooperation with like-minded nations, bypassing bilateral bottlenecks.
India’s Revitalization Efforts
- Institutional strengthening: India led efforts to adopt the BIMSTEC Charter (2022), giving legal and structural clarity.
- Financial and technical support: India contributes to the BIMSTEC Secretariat and offers capacity-building across sectors.
- Sectoral leadership: India leads in key areas—security, environment, counterterrorism, transport, and connectivity.
- Master Plan for Transport Connectivity: India played a key role in drafting and funding infrastructure corridors under this plan.
- Digital and energy initiatives: Push for regional energy grid, coastal shipping, and digital public infrastructure cooperation.
- Security cooperation: Hosting annual National Security Chiefs’ meetings to tackle terror, trafficking, and maritime crime.
Challenges Hindering BIMSTEC’s Potential
- Slow implementation: Project delays, weak funding, and bureaucratic inertia slow regional progress.
- Asymmetry among members: Economic and institutional gaps create dependency on India and uneven participation.
- Overlapping forums: Multiple regional platforms dilute focus and create coordination fatigue.
- Limited visibility: BIMSTEC lacks public awareness, reducing stakeholder pressure for accountability.
- China factor: Some Southeast Asian members balance India with China, reducing BIMSTEC’s cohesion.
Way Forward
- Prioritise connectivity: Fast-tracking the Kaladan Project and India–Thailand–Myanmar Trilateral Highway is vital.
- Strengthen institutional mechanisms: Establish dispute resolution and project monitoring frameworks.
- Promote economic integration: Push for BIMSTEC FTA and value chain development in trade, tourism, and services.
- Enhance visibility: Public diplomacy and media outreach can build grassroots support for BIMSTEC projects.
- Align with Indo-Pacific strategy: BIMSTEC should complement India’s maritime diplomacy and regional security efforts.
Conclusion
BIMSTEC remains a promising but underleveraged regional platform. For India, revitalising it is not just strategic—it is essential. A proactive, sustained push can transform BIMSTEC into a cornerstone of India’s regional leadership.