- The Minimum Wages Act is ambiguous in its intent to support domestic employees facing financial difficulties. As the nature of household work has not been clearly identified and defined, there is room for ambiguity.
- Furthermore, governments haven’t set the working hours for them, which makes figuring out the minimum pay a challenge.
- It is insufficient for state governments to simply include domestic care employees in the definition of a worker if they want to formally recognise domestic care workers.
- The Supreme Court monitored the execution of the Unorganised Workers’ Social Security Act and voiced dissatisfaction that all state governments had not constituted state boards under the Act.
- Furthermore, the Supreme Court stated that all state governments must register all domestic care workers under this Act in order to receive benefits.
From the above arguments we see that domestic work is not governed by any legal framework in India. Despite many attempts by federal and state governments, it has not been possible to establish a legal framework exclusively for these workers.
- A focused legislation would provide them with consistent rights and lessen their reliance on the generosity of particular employers. The ILO’s Convention 189, which has been approved by more than 29 other nations, is the best model for such a regulation.
- An efficient enforcement mechanism and a legislative framework for domestic care workers are essential in India for laws meant for them to be successful.
- A dispute redress mechanism is also required for the regulation of the informal sector. The gaps in these existing laws should be examined thoroughly.