|
Reforms |
Outcomes |
| First Generation |
During the pre-Independence period (till 1947), the Swadeshi Movement saw the birth of many small and local banks |
Most failed mainly due to internal frauds, interconnected lending, and the combining of trading and banking books. |
| Second generation (1947-1967) |
Indian banks facilitated resource mobilisation through retail deposits) |
Banking sector got concentrated in a few business families or groups
Neglected credit flow to agriculture. |
| Third generation (1967-1991) |
The government was successful in breaking the nexus between industry and banks through the nationalisation of 20 major private banks in two phases (1969 and 1980) and introduction of priority sector lending (1972). |
These initiatives resulted in the shift from ‘class banking’ to ‘mass banking’ and had a positive impact on the expansion of branch network across (rural) India, massive mobilisation of public deposits and incremental credit flow to agriculture and allied sectors.
However, the banking industry experienced a decline in asset quality, financial soundness, and efficiency during this period as a result of relaxation in credit standards to meet the priority sector targets. |
| Fourth generation (1991-2014) |
Indian banking saw landmark reforms such as
- Issue of fresh licences to private and foreign banks
- Introduction of prudential norms
- Providing operational flexibility coupled with functional autonomy
- Focus on implementation of best corporate governance practices
- Strengthening of capital base as per the Basel norms.
- Since 2014, the banking sector has witnessed the adoption of the JAM (Jan-Dhan, Aadhaar, and Mobile) trinity, and issuance of licences to Payments Banks and Small Finance Banks (SFBs)
|
Reforms infused competition, thereby enhancing productivity as well as efficiency by leveraging technology.
SFBs has helped to achieve last-mile connectivity in the financial inclusion drive. |