Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests.
In News: External affairs minister S. Jaishankar said that recognising the “legitimate interests of partners”, along with respecting international law, is key to building a durable world order. Jaishankar was speaking at the special foreign minister level meeting of the trilateral group of Russia-India-China, which was being held through video conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The initial remarks of the three foreign ministers were televised live, after which they switched to ‘closed-door’ discussions.
The meeting took place in the backdrop of ongoing border tensions between India and China. Since the special meeting was held to mark 75 years of the victory over the Axis powers, Jaishankar began by reminding both Russia and China that 2.3 million Indian troops had helped the Allies win the Second World War.
Key Takeaways of the Virtual RIC meet
The special meeting of RIC on 23rd June 2020 was held to mark 75 years of the victory over the Axis powers in World War-II, The ministerial-level engagements took place in the backdrop of ongoing border tensions between India and China, which has resulted in the first army casualties in 45 years. However, bilateral matters (Indo-China) were not discussed.
Russia, India, and China are going to “increase interaction with ASEAN-based structures…” including on COVID-19 issues.
India stressed upon
Respecting international law: This special meeting, reiterates our belief in the time-tested principles of international relations. But the challenge today is not just one of concepts and norms, but equally of their practice. The leading voices of the world must be exemplars in every way. Respecting international law, recognising the legitimate interests of partners, supporting multilateralism and promoting common good are the only way of building a durable world order.
Recognising the legitimate interests of partners: India did not get its due recognition in the global order post World War II and that the historical injustice remained “uncorrected” for the last 75 years. When the victors met to fashion the ensuing global order, the political circumstances of that era did not give India due recognition. This historical injustice has stood uncorrected for the last 75 years, even as the world has changed. It was important for the world to realise both the contribution that India made and the need to rectify the past.
Supporting multilateralism and promoting common good are the only way of building a durable world order: The External Affairs Minister also spoke about the need for reforming the United Nations so that it can represent the current reality of the globe. But beyond history, international affairs must also come to terms with contemporary reality. The United Nations began with 50 members; today it has 193. Surely, its decision making cannot continue to be in denial of this fact.
RIC
RIC is a strategic grouping that first took shape in the late 1990s under the leadership of Yevgeny Primakov, a Russian politician as “a counterbalance to the Western alliance.”
This idea of a ‘strategic triangle’ took a tangible form when former Foreign Ministers of Russia, China, and India met on the margins of the UN General Assembly in New York in September 2002.
The group was founded on the basis of ending Russia’s subservient foreign policy guided by the USA andrenewing old ties with India and fostering the newly discovered friendship with China.
The grouping was formed in an aim to ensure that it is not left to the America-led West alone to shape the rules of global governance
Relevance of RIC for India
Membership for India was always about containing China in Eurasia
Forum for Cooperation: Even though India, China and Russia may disagree on a number of security issues in Eurasia, there are areas where their interests converge, like, for instance, on Afghanistan. RIC can ensure stable peace in Afghanistan and by extension, in Central Asia.
Governance over Arctic: With the Northern Sea Route opening up due to climate change, the RIC has a common interest in ensuring that it is not left to the West and Russia alone and that India and China also have major say in rules governing the Arctic route
Critical Analysis of RIC
India’s growing strategic partnership with the United States, Japan, and Australia conflicts with the RIC’s goals and objectives of seeking to undermine Washington’s role in the Indo-Pacific.
There is growing Russia-China Axis which undermines the grouping relevance for India
China is Russia’s biggest trading partner and the largest Asian investor in Russia.
China sees Russia as a powerhouse of raw material and a growing market for its consumer goods
The West’s approach towards Russia after the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and recent US-China trade war has brought Russia & China much closer
There is also growing dependence of Russia on Chinese consumption.
Also, over 70% of China’s arms imports now come from Russia
So is Russia now a permanent ally of China?
Not necessarily, western analysts see Russia-China as a “friendship of convenience” between two countries
Russia has been extremely calibrated in its statements on issues on which Beijing is most sensitive to: Huawei’s 5G rollout, Hong Kong and the Covid-19 pandemic
China does not recognise Crimea as part of Russia, and Moscow, formally speaking, takes a neutral stance on Beijing’s claims in the South China Sea.
Russia maintains steady relationship with India. Nearly 60 to 70 % of India’s defence supplies are from Russia
India decided to reach out to RIC since it believes Russia has leverage and influence to shape and change Beijing’s stance on certain issues
Did You Know?
Together, the RIC countries occupy over 19 percent of the global landmass and contribute to over 33 percent of global GDP.
All three countries are nuclear powers and two, Russia and China, are permanent members of the UN Security Council, while India aspires to be one.
