- Home
- UPSC Mains
- Daily Free Initiatives
- Courses
- KPSC / KAS
- हिंदी
- Centres
- Contact Us
Topic: General Studies 3:
- Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, mobilization, of resources, growth, development and employment.
- Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways, Telecommunications etc.
Context
In Oct 2019, the Supreme Court had directed telecom service providers to pay the pending dues –aggregating to over Rs 1.47 lakh crore – to the government by 23rd January 2020
The decision impacts over 15 telecom firms, both current and defunct, but those with the highest liabilities are Vodafone-Idea Ltd (Rs 53,038 crore), Airtel (Rs 35,586 crore) and Tata Teleservices (Rs 13,823 crore)
Brief History of the issue:
1994 – Telecom sector was liberalised under the National Telecom Policy under which licenses were issued to companies in return for a fixed license fee.
1999 – The government gave an option to the licensees to migrate to the revenue sharing fee model, so as to provide relief from high licence fees .
| Department of Telecom’s(DOT) Stand | Telecos Stand |
| AGR includes all revenues (before discounts) from both telecom and non-telecom services | AGR should comprise just the revenue accrued from core services and not dividend, interest income or profit on sale of any investment or fixed assets. |
2005– Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) challenged the government’s definition for AGR calculation.
2015 – TDSAT (Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal) ruled in favour of Telecos
Oct 2019 – Supreme Court set aside TDSAT’s order and upheld DOT’s definition of AGR
Jan 2020 – Supreme Court has accepted petition of Telecos request to extend the deadline fixed at 23rd Jan 2020 to pay up the dues (but not on the definition of AGR)
Why the definition of AGR is important?
Because it has revenue implications for both government & Telecos.
Implication of the Supreme Court’s 2019 Order
Way ahead
Connecting the Dots