Archives


(PRELIMS  Focus)


Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021

Category: Polity and Governance

Context:

               

About Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021:

About SC Observations and Rulings:

Source:


CE20 Cryogenic Engine

Category: Science and Technology

Context:

About CE20 Cryogenic Engine:

Source:


Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)

Category: International Organisations

Context:

About Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC):

Source:


Adam Chini Rice

Category: Miscellaneous

Context:

About Adam Chini Rice:

Source:


Exercise Ajeya Warrior 2025

Category: Defence and Security

Context:

About Exercise Ajeya Warrior:

Source:


(MAINS Focus)


End of the Red Corridor: India’s Battle Against Left-Wing Extremism Turns a Corner

(GS Paper III – Internal Security: Left-Wing Extremism, Security Forces, Governance & Development)

 

Context (Introduction)
The killing of top Maoist commander Madvi Hidma in Andhra Pradesh marks a turning point in India’s two-decade struggle against Left-Wing Extremism (LWE). Improved policing, leadership targeting, and development efforts have sharply shrunk Maoist influence across the Red Corridor.

 

Main Arguments

  1. Shift from Maoist dominance to State control: In the early 2000s, PWG cadres held vast tribal-forest belts from Andhra Pradesh to Nepal — termed the “Compact Revolutionary Zone.” Maoists controlled interiors due to weak governance and favourable terrain.
  2. Political ambiguity enabled regrouping: States, especially Andhra Pradesh in 2004, alternated between police withdrawal and peace talks. Ceasefires allowed Maoists to consolidate, culminating in the 2004 PWG–MCC merger forming CPI (Maoist).
  3. Severe constraints on early security operations: Forces lacked anti-mine vehicles, fortified police stations, and helicopter support. Stints in Maoist zones were viewed as punishment postings. Intelligence suffered due to lack of local-language capacity.
  4. Escalation of Maoist violence (2006–2013): Attacks intensified: the Tadmetla ambush killed 76 CRPF personnel (2010) and the 2013 Jhiram Ghati attack wiped out Chhattisgarh’s Congress leadership. Affected districts reached 126 in 2013.
  5. Strategic overhaul since 2014: The Centre prioritised modernisation of forces, strengthened inter-State coordination, choked financing networks, targeted top leadership, and expanded welfare schemes. Affected districts reduced to 38 (2024) and now to just 11.

 

Criticisms / Drawbacks/Limitations

  1. Treating LWE merely as a law-and-order problem: Early policies underestimated its ideological and armed revolutionary character, resulting in slow, inconsistent State responses.
  2. Ceasefire missteps and political signalling: Talks without verification mechanisms enabled Maoists to regroup, recruit, and rearm — reversing earlier operational gains.
  3. Weak grassroots policing infrastructure: Insufficient police stations, poor road networks, and scarce local recruitment limited State presence in remote tribal belts.
  4. Persistent governance vacuum in interiors: Slow progress in roads, schools, telecom, and welfare schemes allowed Maoists to position themselves as parallel authorities.
  5. Maoist adaptability to terrain and borders: Dense forests, tri-junction borders (AP–Chhattisgarh–Odisha), and tribal alienation provided operational and social cover for cadres.

 

Reforms and Way Forward

  1. Strengthen Local Policing & Intelligence
    • Expand fortified police stations in interior tribal zones.
    • Recruit local youth fluent in dialects for intelligence.
    • Replicate Greyhounds and C-60–style specialised units nationally.
  2. Technology-driven Operations
    • Scale use of drones, satellite mapping, helicopter mobility, and anti-landmine vehicles.
    • Build integrated command systems across affected tri-junctions.
  3. Leadership Targeting & Financial Disruption
    • Sustain operations removing top leaders and active dalams.
    • Target extortion, illegal mining, and forest-produce revenue streams.
  4. Address Governance Deficits
    • Accelerate Special Central Assistance for roads, telecom, health and education.
    • Ensure fast compensation and grievance redressal in conflict-hit areas.
    • Expand power supply, banking access, and digital services.
  5. Community-Centric Development & Rehabilitation
    • Promote tribal welfare, forest rights implementation, and participatory planning.
    • Strengthen surrender, rehabilitation, and livelihood programmes.
    • Counter Maoist narratives through local influencers and SHG networks.

 

Conclusion

Two decades after being termed India’s “single biggest internal security challenge,” Left-Wing Extremism is in visible retreat. The convergence of improved policing, targeted operations, and expanding development has fractured Maoist organisational capacity. Yet, sustaining gains requires deep governance penetration, empowered tribal communities, and continued vigilance to prevent resurgence.

 

Mains Question

  1. Left-Wing Extremism has seen a marked decline in recent years. Analyse the factors behind this trend and suggest measures to consolidate the gains achieved. (250 words, 15 marks)

Source: The Indian Express


The Threat of Digital Tradecraft in Modern Terrorism

(GS Paper III – Internal Security: Terrorism, Cybersecurity, Encrypted Communication, Counter-Radicalisation)

 

Context (Introduction)
The Red Fort car blast in Delhi on November 10, which killed 15 people, has exposed a new frontier in terrorism where extremist cells combine encrypted digital tools, private servers, and spy-style communication to evade surveillance and coordinate attacks.

 

Main Arguments

  1. Use of high-privacy encrypted apps: Investigators found that the accused used Threema, an E2EE messaging app that requires no phone number and leaves minimal metadata. The module may have operated from a private Threema server, enabling isolated, untraceable communication.
  2. Adoption of digital “dead-drop” emails: The cell reportedly used shared email accounts in which drafts (not sent messages) were updated and deleted — a classic espionage method leaving no communication trail, bypassing phone or email logging systems.
  3. Sophisticated operational planning: The group conducted multiple reconnaissance missions using routine vehicles, stockpiled ammonium nitrate, and maintained disciplined communication gaps after arrests — reflecting a professional understanding of counter-surveillance.
  4. External ideological or operational linkages: Preliminary leads suggest possible ties with or inspiration from Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM). The communication architecture — encrypted apps, dead-drop emails, minimal digital footprint — indicates high-level training and organisational backing.
  5. Alignment with global academic research: Scholarship repeatedly warns that extremist actors increasingly exploit E2EE platforms, VPNs, and decentralised networks, combining physical tradecraft with digital anonymity in ways that weaken traditional counter-terrorism tools.

 

Criticisms / Drawbacks/Limitations

  1. Limitations of traditional surveillance: Phone tapping, metadata analysis, and email intercepts become ineffective when extremists use private servers, VPNs, and apps with zero metadata retention.
  2. Regulatory gaps on self-hosted platforms: Banning Threema (under IT Act Sec 69A) has limited impact because terror modules use VPNs and offshore hosting. Law enforcement lacks a framework to monitor private encrypted servers.
  3. Inadequate cyber-forensics capability: Many agencies still rely on device seizure rather than advanced memory forensics, server-side analysis, or encrypted-network mapping.
  4. Failure to detect radicalisation in professional spaces: The involvement of medical professionals from a university shows that radicalisation can occur among highly educated individuals, where existing monitoring or awareness systems are weak.
  5. Risks of transnational networks: If external handlers are confirmed, India faces challenges in securing cross-border cooperation, especially where encrypted infrastructure is located abroad.

 

Reforms and Way Forward

  1. Build specialised digital-forensics and cyber-intelligence units
    • Expand teams skilled in decrypting memory dumps, analysing E2EE misuse, and tracking private servers.
    • Train personnel in dark-web monitoring, digital dead-drop detection, and server-level forensics.
    • Strengthen NIA and State ATS cyber labs with modern tools.
  2. Regulate self-hosted encrypted infrastructure
    • Create frameworks requiring private communication servers to maintain minimal lawful-access compliance.
    • Establish judicially supervised protocols for cooperation with providers of encrypted apps.
    • Track VPN exit nodes and anonymisation networks linked to terror activity.
  3. Modernise legal frameworks for digital terrorism
    • Amend counter-terrorism laws to recognise encrypted dead-drops, decentralised communication, and private servers.
    • Mandate detection of high-risk shared accounts or draft-only mailboxes in investigations.
    • Strengthen admissibility standards for cyber-forensic evidence.
  4. Strengthen institutional and community vigilance
    • Equip universities, hospitals, and professional bodies with counter-radicalisation resources.
    • Launch targeted awareness programmes for high-skill sectors vulnerable to ideological recruitment.
    • Build early-warning mechanisms through counselling cells, faculty training, and student support networks.
  5. Deepen international cooperation
    • Engage foreign governments, cybersecurity entities, and encrypted-app host countries through tech diplomacy.
    • Enhance intelligence sharing on E2EE misuse, server hosting, funding routes, and cross-border handlers.
    • Partner with global cyber-forensics centres for training and joint operations.

 

Conclusion

The Red Fort blast demonstrates that modern terrorism is increasingly digital, decentralised, and encrypted. As extremist cells adopt sophisticated tradecraft across physical and virtual domains, India must expand cyber-forensics, regulate private encrypted infrastructure, strengthen institutional vigilance, and collaborate globally. Counter-terrorism now requires not only boots on the ground, but also capability in code, servers, and encrypted networks.

 

Mains Question

  1. The Red Fort blast highlights how encrypted communication and digital tradecraft are reshaping terrorism. Examine how such technologies complicate counter-terrorism efforts and suggest reforms to strengthen India’s digital security architecture.(250 words, 15 marks)

Source: The Hindu

Search now.....

Sign Up To Receive Regular Updates