1) How do you formulate religious language as non-cognitive?
2) Religious language is dependent on natural language for an analogy and a symbol of work. Why not treat religious language as a specialized language like telegraphic language? Discuss.
3) Do cognitivist provide cogent answer to the objection based on falsibility?
4) Man’s ultimate concern must be expressed symbolically because symbolic language alone is able to express the ultimate.” – Paul Tillich. Critical Notes.