fbpx

Baba’s Explainer – Centre and State powers over Water Resources

  • IASbaba
  • October 11, 2022
  • 0
Environment & Ecology, Governance
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

ARCHIVES

Syllabus

  • GS-2: Federal Issues
  • GS-2: Inter-state river water disputes

Context: Recently, Delhi Chief Minister urged Prime Minister to solve the long-pending Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal issue between Punjab and Haryana, saying, “It’s the duty of the Centre to ensure water for Punjab and Haryana, not to make them fight”.

  • Apart from Punjab, many states like Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka have complained of inadequate disbursal of funds by Centre, claiming that the delay has caused stalling of important dam projects.
  • Moreover, States have often accused the Centre of hogging the credit for several such developments achieved by State governments in their area.
  • Subjects like electricity, water resources, law and order, judiciary, and finance have a power overlap between Centre and States in the Constitution – leading to a tussle between the Centre and States.
Who has the jurisdiction over Water in India?
  • Article 246 grants the Centre the exclusive power to make laws on the following subjects under List I of the Seventh Schedule:
    • Decide on shipping and navigation on inland and tidal (sea) waterways and on national waterways for vessels
    • Regulate training and education of mercantile marines by states and other agencies
    • Decide on goods, passengers by sea or national waterways via mechanically propelled vessels
    • Regulate and develop interstate rivers and river valleys
    • Decide on fishing and fisheries beyond territorial waters
  • Similarly, States are empowered to:
    • Develop roads, bridges, ferries, municipal tramways, ropeways and other means of communication on inland waterways in the State
    • Decide on water supply, irrigation and canals, drainage and embankments, water storage and water power
    • Taxes on goods and passengers carried by road or on inland waterways
    • Decide on shipping and navigation on inland waterways via mechanically propelled vessels and carriage of passengers and goods on such waters
  • On comparing the two lists, there appears to be an overlap in the powers of the Centre and State as far as shipping and navigation on inland waterways is concerned.
  • Moreover, the development of water supplies, canals and riverbanks is also an area of conflict between States.
  • One of the major water-related issues tasked to the Centre, inter-State river disputes in India are governed bythe Inter-State River Water Dispute Act, 1956.
    • An amendment to the Act was passed by the Lok Sabha in 2019 but is yet to get the Upper House’s nod.
How are river disputes resolved?
  • Under the Inter-State River Water Dispute Act, 1956, any State may request the Centre to refer an inter-State river dispute to a tribunal for adjudication.
  • If the Centre feels that negotiations cannot settle the dispute, it may setup such a Water Disputes Tribunal within one year of the complaint.
  • The tribunal must decide on the dispute within three years, which may be extended by two years.
  • However, if the matter is again referred to the Tribunal for further consideration, it must submit a report to the Centre within one year, which may be extended if deemed necessary.
  • All decisions of the Tribunal are final and binding . After its publication in the Official Gazette, a decision has the same force as an order of the Supreme Court.
  • The Centre may create a scheme to give effect to the decision of such a tribunal. It is also tasked with maintaining a data bank of each river basin in the country.
Changes Proposed in 2019 Bill
  • The 2019 amendment Bill, however, streamlines this mechanism by dissolving all existing Tribunals and transferring ongoing disputes to the Inter-State River Water Disputes Tribunal which may have multiple benches.
  • It also constitutes a Disputes Resolution Committee for any river dispute with Central government members, experts, and members of each party State to resolve the issue within one year, which may be extended by six months.
  • Disputes unresolved by the committee will be sent to the Tribunal which comprises of Central government ministers or nominees and a Supreme Court Judge.
  • Under the 1956 Act, the Tribunal must give its decision within three years, which may be extended by two years.  Under the 2019 amendment Bill, the proposed Tribunal must give its decision on the dispute within two years, which may be extended by another year.
  • Under the 1956 Act, the decision of the Tribunal must be published by the central government in the official gazette.  This decision has the same force as that of an order of the Supreme Court.  The Bill removes the requirement of such publication.  It adds that the decision of the Bench of the Tribunal will be final and binding on the parties involved in the dispute.
  • Also, the Centre is mandated to create a scheme to implement the Tribunal’s decision.
Which are India’s major river disputes?

1.Cauvery Dispute (Karnataka-Tamil Nadu):

  • India’s southern states Karnataka and Tamil Nadu have been feuding over the water usage of the Cauvery River since 1924.
  • During the British era, as per an agreement between the Madras Presidency and Mysore state, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry were awarded 75% of surplus water, while Karnataka would get 23% and the remaining would be used by Kerala.
  • Over time, with the increase in irrigation needs of Tamil Nadu, the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) allocated it 419 TMC (thousand million cubic feet) from the river basin. It further allotted 270 TMC to Karnataka, 30 TMC to Kerala and 7 TMC to Puducherry.
  • With Karnataka refusing to release 134 TMC to Tamil Nadu from June to September, Tamil Nadu moved the Supreme Court seeking relief.
  • Finally, in February 2018, the apex court reduced Tamil Nadu’s allocation to 404.25 TMC from 419 TMC annually, hiking Karnataka’s allocation by 14.75 TMC to 284.75 TMC.
  • SC says its verdict on Cauvery water allocation will continue for next 15 years.
  • With the dispute resolved, the Tribunal was dissolved and both states are complying with the award.
  1. Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal (Punjab-Haryana)
  • After the partition of Punjab in 1947, the rivers – Ravi and Beas which had a combined flow of 15.85 MAF (million acre feet) — was split as such –
    • Rajasthan (8 MAF)
    • undivided Punjab (7.2 MAF)
    • Jammu and Kashmir (0.65 MAF).
  • After the 1966 reorganisation of Punjab resulted in the creation of Haryana, the new state was allocated 3.5 MAF per year; however Punjab sought to retain its share of 7.2 MAF (the volume allotted to undivided Punjab).
  • After reassessment in 1981,
    • Punjab was allotted 4.22 MAF
    • Haryana 3.5 MAF
    • Rajasthan 8.6 MAF.
  • To implement this decision, the 214 km-long Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) Canal was flagged in 1982 with 122 km to be constructed in Punjab and 92 km in Harayana.
  • Moreover, a Tribunal was set up which awarded 5 MAF to Punjab and 3.83 MAF to Haryana of the SYL canal waters.
  • However, the Punjab part of the project was stalled due to heavy opposition from Punjab, leading to militancy and the murders of Akali Dal chief Sant Harchand Singh Longowal (who agreed to the split) and the project’s chief engineer M L Sekhri.
  • Since then, Punjab has refused to share water with any other state as 79% of its ground water has been depleted due to its excessive farming of wheat and paddy (both needing high water supply).
  • While Haryana has sought its rightful share of the rivers and completion of the SYL project, the Supreme Court has urged the Centre to arrange a meeting between Haryana CM Manohar Lal Khattar and his Punjab counterpart Bhagwant Mann.
  • The newly elected AAP government has signalled its willingness to resolve the issue with the Centre’s intervention.
  1. Polavaram project dispute (Andhra Pradesh-Telangana)
  • The Polavaram project was constructed in undivided Andhra Pradesh to direct 80 TMC of Godavari river waters to the Krishna river to share water with Karnataka and Maharashtra.
  • Since the formation of Telangana in 2014, the project has been a bone of contention between the two States.
  • While Andhra Pradesh has claimed the project is essential to irrigate its Godavari districts, Telangana has raised fears of backwaters flooding the Khammam district.
  • Recently, on July 15,2022 Andhra CM ordered an increase in the height of the upper cofferdam of Polavaram from 42.5 metres to 44 metres to withstand massive floods and increase its capacity. This led to an uproar in Telangana with levelling allegations that the increase in dam height caused the inundation of the temple town of Bhadrachalam and several villages along the course of the Godavari river.
  • Telangana has often urged the Centre to stall further construction on the Polavaram project stating that the project’s Full Tank Level (FTL) of 45.7 metres will result in backwaters of 45.5 ft at Bhadrachalam – flooding Godavari’s tributaries Pranahita, Sabari and Indravati.
What are state-level water issues?
  • On a State level, each government forms laws for water management across its districts to regulate water usage by industries, set rules for water treatment, set water tariffs and manage sewage water generated.
  • The Haryana Water Resources (Conservation, Regulation and Management) Authority Act, 2020 is the example of such an act which constitutes an authority to fix tariffs for all uses of water and set rules for the use & disposal of treated wastewater.
  • Similarly, the Karnataka government passed the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 2021 to provide rainwater harvesting structures to citizens, so as to reduce dependency on Cauvery or underground water, and also mitigate urban flooding.
  • Some states like Andhra Pradesh and Kerala have passed irrigation and water conservation laws to stop river pollution, specify limits on water supply for irrigating crops and penalize those who violate these norms.
  • Though States manage rivers and prevent its pollution, the Centre also undertakes river-cleaning projects of India’s major rivers – like the National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG).
What is National Mission for Clean Ganga?
  • National Mission for Clean Ganga(NMCG) was registered as a society on 12th August 2011 under the Societies Registration Act 1860.
  • It acted as implementation arm of National Ganga River Basin Authority(NGRBA) which was constituted under the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act (EPA),1986.
  • NGRBA has since been dissolved with effect from the 7th October 2016, consequent to constitution of National Council for Rejuvenation, Protection and Management of River Ganga (referred as National Ganga Council)

Objectives

  • The operational area of this project comprises the Ganges Basin and all states through which the river flows, including Delhi.
  • The objective of the National Mission for Clean Ganga is to reduce pollution and ensure rejuvenation of the Ganga river.
  • This can be achieved by promoting intersectoral co-ordination for comprehensive planning & management and maintaining minimum ecological flow in the river, with the aim of ensuring water quality and environmentally sustainable development.
  • The National Mission for Clean Ganga includes undertaking massive afforestation activities to conserve biodiversity, along with developing the flora & fauna and carrying out effective plans & policies to conserve dolphins, turtles and varieties of fish.

Structure and Progress

  • Under the Environment (Protection) Amendment Act (EPA) ,2016, the NMCG was given a two tier management structure — Governing Council and Executive Committee — at National, State and district levels.
  • The river Ganga originating from the Himalayan mountain range, flows through Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal before winding into the Bay of Bengal.
  • Under the NMCG (managed by the Jal Shakti Ministry), PM Narendra Modi flagged the Namami Gange project in 2014 with an outlay of Rs. 20,000 crores.
  • Aimed at rejuvenating Ganga, Namami Gange comprises of developing sewerage treatment infrastructure, river-front development, river-surface cleaning, afforestation, industrial effluent monitoring, enhancing the river’s bio-diversity, developing Ganga Gram (villages on Ganga banks) and raise public awareness.
  • As of date, under Namami Gange, 98 sewage projects have been completed in the states of Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, and Rajasthan and 48 are under implementation.
  • 70 ghats/crematoria projects are being constructed along the river banks, while 267 ghats/crematoria and kunds/ponds are under renovation.
  • Collection of floating solid waste from the surface of the ghats and river surface and its disposal is being done at 11 locations in various states.
  • 1072 Grossly Polluting Industries (GPIs) were identified along the banks of the river in 2017 – of which 636 are complying to environmental norms, 110 are non-complying and 215 are self-closed. All 110 non-compliant GPIs have been issued closure notices by the Centre.
  • Moreover, 1674 Gram Panchayats were found situated on the river banks and Rs. 578 Crores has been released to Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation (MoDWS) for construction of toilets in these villages.
  • However, repeatedly several High Courts have pulled up the respective State governments over the pollution of the river and incompletion of the NMCG projects under its purview.
  • Recently, the Allahabad High Court expressed displeasure over the apathy of the government departments in making the river Ganga pollution free in Uttar Pradesh. It added that NMCG had become a machine to disperse money and no one was serious about cleaning the river Ganga.
What initiatives are taken at local level to address drinking water issue?
  • On a local level, providing tapped water to all rural and urban households falls under the purview of the various civic bodies managed by the state governments.
  • The right to clean drinking water has been read into the right to life under Article 21 of the constitution.
  • Water has been deemed a fundamental resource and the Centre and States have been tasked to make policies to distribute water among people.
  • The Centre’s Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM) aims to provide a Functional Household Tap Connection (FHTC) to every rural household by 2024, in collaboration with States and Union Territories (UTs).
    • The scheme also aims to develop bulk water transfer facilities, treatment plants and a robust in-village water distribution network.
    • With an outlay of Rs 3.60 lakh crore, the Centre has pledged a contribution of 100% funds for UTs without a legislature, 90% for North Eastern and Himalayan States/UTs and 50% for other states.
    • As of September 2022, 23 crore households (53.47%) in India have tap water connections.
    • Since the launch of the scheme in 2019, 7 crore (44%) households have received new tap connections.
    • States like Goa, Telangana and Haryana and UTs like Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Puducherry, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu have achieved 100% tap water connections.
    • However large states like Jharkhand and Uttar Pradesh have only 23.04% and 17.54% households which have tap water connections.

Main Practice Question: How successfully has centre handled various inter-state river water dispute? Do you think the proposed amendment bill of River Disputes Act of 1956 will empower centre to resolve such disputes in more effective manner? Comment

Note: Write answer his question in the comment section.


For a dedicated peer group, Motivation & Quick updates, Join our official telegram channel – https://t.me/IASbabaOfficialAccount

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE to watch Explainer Videos, Strategy Sessions, Toppers Talks & many more…

Search now.....

Sign Up To Receive Regular Updates